top of page
  • Dr. J

Make an INFORMED choice

After all... it is YOUR body. YOUR health.

If you want to smoke cigarets, drink soda, not exercise, and be a stressed out-negative person all day ---- that's YOUR choice to make!

NO one, in any scenario, should force or coerce you into making a choice that affects your health.

Which, we've learned from history.

--> Look up the Nuremberg Trails, and the Nuremberg Code.

(This is not a finished article... but, there are a lot of good resources to start diving into and didn't want this just sitting in the drafts)

Quick guides to understanding the different options out there:


Great interviews with PHDs,

Simple FACTS

At the end of the day; you are DESIGNED to ward off unwanted viruses, bacteria, and other potential pathogens. More specifically - these pathogens are a normal part of our existence, and in most cases, NECESSARY for our survival and expression of optimal health.

We've coexisted with viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites, etc since the existence. of all living things. Bacteria have played an essential role in the development of 'eukaryotic' beings, and play a pivotal role in keeping us healthy. We have only begun to understand the role viruses have played, and by that, I mean a positive role in our development and interaction with our environment. Just the sheer number of bacteria that live on and in us is astounding; at least 10X that of our very own cells! (and we have 37-70 trillion cells, depending on the source) Studies have shown that 8-40% of our genome is derived from viral DNA that has been incorporated into our own at some point along the way, and viruses continue to play an important role in our interaction and adaptations with the world around us; consistently helping our body's update information about our environment.

Much more to get into, as I have other blogs written on this very subject... but needed to get that out of the way.

Oh.. and one more point..

WE WILL NEVER ESCAPE BACTERIA AND VIRUSES. (and particularly viruses ;)

It's been proven, time and time again... but the standard dogma wants to keep us chained to the "germ theory", disempowering you and the innate superpower called your immune system, and want us to remain in a perpetual state of FEAR ---Thus establishing control and leaving the general population buying into their theories and patentable/marketable solutions.

Instead of thinking you're being 'attacked' by germs... why not just accept that they're a natural part of the world (or... should be... until we tinker with them ;), and that by establishing a balanced state of health, your body will innately be resilient and adaptable with any stresses that come along. Which includes any strain of virus or bacteria.

Key Points to Consider:

Is it... really necessary?

To determine this crucial factor -- we need REAL data. Which, has been hard to come by...

Even after 2+ years, any of our governing entities have yet to do a comprehensive, unbiased look at how masks, or lockdowns, or gene therapy 'vaccines' are impacting this 'pandemic'. (Which, isn't apparently a pandemic when many countries have all but given up on every 'protective' measure and have resumed normal life... and somehow have far lower death rates than the US, Canada and other tyrannical countries...)

Actually.. the C/D/C admits to leaving out reports and data that could 'impact public perception of things like vaccines'. Yea... they said that.

Good place to start:

Who's really being affected?

Like I mentioned above... we're NEVER going to be able to escape viruses. They're a part of our environment, and do play an integral role in our overall health. That being said, everyone is 'affected' to some degree. Most will never symptomatically feel the effects, and the vast majority of those that do, experience it as... you guessed it; a cold. As with any viral infection, only a very small majority actually have severe adverse side-effects.

I state it as 'side-effects' because it's typically not the actual viral infection that causes major issues for those susceptible... it's other underlying, more chronic issues that cause havoc.

Since the beginning of this debacle... this part of the story has always been consistent; those with pre-existing condition AND elderly. Which, happens to be no different from any other pathogenic viral strain that circulate the planet every year. Sure, other strains affect people differently, and there's always outliers. Those with cardiovascular disease, overweight, poor metabolic health, diabetes, immune system disorders, etc are, and have always been, more susceptible to any environmental stress.

This really shouldn't take a massive research study to prove, as it should make logical physiological, immunological sense... but apparently we do.

Underlying Medical Conditions and Severe Illness Among 540,667 Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19, March 2020–March 2021

-From the mouth of the beast itself: CDC


Among 4,899,447 hospitalized adults in PHD-SR, 540,667 (11.0%) were patients with COVID-19, of whom 94.9% had at least 1 underlying medical condition. Essential hypertension (50.4%), disorders of lipid metabolism (49.4%), and obesity (33.0%) were the most common. The strongest risk factors for death were obesity (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.27–1.33), anxiety and fear-related disorders (aRR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25–1.31), and diabetes with complication (aRR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.24–1.28), as well as the total number of conditions, with aRRs of death ranging from 1.53 (95% CI, 1.41–1.67) for patients with 1 condition to 3.82 (95% CI, 3.45–4.23) for patients with more than 10 conditions (compared with patients with no conditions).


Certain underlying conditions and the number of conditions were associated with severe COVID-19 illness. Hypertension and disorders of lipid metabolism were the most frequent, whereas obesity, diabetes with complication, and anxiety disorders were the strongest risk factors for severe COVID-19 illness. Careful evaluation and management of underlying conditions among patients with COVID-19 can help stratify risk for severe illness."

Is natural immunity superior to vaccine-induced?

Dr. Peter McCullough

According to Dr. McCullough, a cardiologist, internist and epidemiologist, and editor of two peer-review journals, who has been on the media and medical frontlines fighting for early COVID treatment... “natural immunity is infinitely better than vaccine immunity,” and studies have borne that out time and again. The reason natural immunity is superior to vaccine-induced immunity is because viruses contain five different proteins.

The COVID shot induces antibodies against just one of those proteins, the spike protein, and no T cell immunity. When you’re infected with the whole virus, you develop antibodies against all parts of the virus, plus memory T cells.

This also means natural immunity offers better protection against variants, as it recognizes several parts of the virus. If there are significant alternations to the spike protein, as with the Delta variant, vaccine-induced immunity can be evaded. Not so with natural immunity, as the other proteins are still recognized and attacked.

Here’s a sampling of scholarly publications that have investigated natural immunity as it pertains to SARS-CoV-2 infection. There are several more in addition to these:12

Science Immunology October 202013found that “RBD-targeted antibodies are excellent markers of previous and recent infection, that differential isotype measurements can help distinguish between recent and older infections, and that IgG responses persist over the first few months after infection and are highly correlated with neutralizing antibodies.” The BMJ January 202114 concluded that “Of 11, 000 health care workers who had proved evidence of infection during the first wave of the pandemic in the U.K. between March and April 2020, none had symptomatic reinfection in the second wave of the virus between October and November 2020.” Science February 202115 reported that “Substantial immune memory is generated after COVID-19, involving all four major types of immune memory [antibodies, memory B cells, memory CD8+ T cells, and memory CD4+ T cells].

About 95% of subjects retained immune memory at ~6 months after infection. Circulating antibody titers were not predictive of T cell memory. Thus, simple serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies do not reflect the richness and durability of immune memory to SARS-CoV-2.”

A 2,800-person study found no symptomatic reinfections over a ~118-day window, and a 1,246-person study observed no symptomatic reinfections over 6 months. A February 2021 study posted on the prepublication server medRxiv16concluded that “Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy ~95% for at least seven months.” An April 2021 study posted on medRxiv17 reported “the overall estimated level of protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for documented infection is 94.8%; hospitalization 94.1%; and severe illness 96·4%. Our results question the need to vaccinate previously-infected individuals.” Another April 2021 study posted on the preprint server BioRxiv18 concluded that “following a typical case of mild COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells not only persist but continuously differentiate in a coordinated fashion well into convalescence, into a state characteristic of long-lived, self-renewing memory.” A May 2020 report in the journal Immunity19 confirmed that SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies are detected in COVID-19 convalescent subjects, as well as cellular immune responses. Here, they found that neutralizing antibody titers do correlate with the number of virus-specific T cells. A May 2021 Nature article20 found SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells, which are a crucial source of protective antibodies. Even after mild infection, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies were detectable beyond 11 months’ post-infection. A May 2021 study in E Clinical Medicine21 found “antibody detection is possible for almost a year post-natural infection of COVID-19.” According to the authors, “Based on current evidence, we hypothesize that antibodies to both S and N-proteins after natural infection may persist for longer than previously thought, thereby providing evidence of sustainability that may influence post-pandemic planning.” Cure-Hub data22 confirm that while COVID shots can generate higher antibody levels than natural infection, this does not mean vaccine-induced immunity is more protective. Importantly, natural immunity confers much wider protection as your body recognizes all five proteins of the virus and not just one. With the COVID shot, your body only recognizes one of these proteins, the spike protein. A June 2021 Nature article23 points out that “Wang et al. show that, between six and 12 months after infection, the concentration of neutralizing antibodies remains unchanged. That the acute immune reaction extends even beyond six months is suggested by the authors’ analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells in the blood of the convalescent individuals over the course of the year.

These memory B cells continuously enhance the reactivity of their SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies through a process known as somatic hypermutation. The good news is that the evidence thus far predicts that infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces long-term immunity in most individuals.”

-Via Craig Burns

Had COVID? You’ll probably make antibodies for a lifetime

People who recover from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades, although viral variants could dampen some of the protection they offer.

Prevalence and Durability of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Among Unvaccinated US Adults by History of COVID-19 want to smoke ciggarets, drink soda, not exercise, and be a stressed out, negative person all day ---- that's YOUR choice to make!

2021-10-25 ::: Nature of the COVID-era public health disaster in the USA, from all-cause mortality and socio-geo-economic and climatic data

Iceland says it wants ‘as many people as possible’ to catch Covid after lifting all restrictions


Is it... actually effective?

"The short-term effectiveness of a two-dose regimen of the BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was demonstrated in clinical trials2 and in observational settings3,4. However, long term effectiveness across different variants is still unknown, though reports of waning immunity are beginning to surface, not merely in terms of antibody dynamics over time57, but in real-world settings as well8. Alongside the question of long-term protection provided by the vaccine, the degree and duration to which previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 affords protection against repeated infection also remains unclear."

Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States