Make an INFORMED choice

After all... it is YOUR body. YOUR health.

If you want to smoke cigarets, drink soda, not exercise, and be a stressed out-negative person all day ---- that's YOUR choice to make!

NO one, in any scenario, should force or coerce you into making a choice that affects your health.

Which, we've learned from history.

--> Look up the Nuremberg Trails, and the Nuremberg Code.

(This is not a finished article... but, there are a lot of good resources to start diving into and didn't want this just sitting in the drafts)

Quick guides to understanding the different options out there:


Great interviews with PHDs,

Simple FACTS

At the end of the day; you are DESIGNED to ward off unwanted viruses, bacteria, and other potential pathogens. More specifically - these pathogens are a normal part of our existence, and in most cases, NECESSARY for our survival and expression of optimal health.

We've coexisted with viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites, etc since the existence. of all living things. Bacteria have played an essential role in the development of 'eukaryotic' beings, and play a pivotal role in keeping us healthy. We have only begun to understand the role viruses have played, and by that, I mean a positive role in our development and interaction with our environment. Just the sheer number of bacteria that live on and in us is astounding; at least 10X that of our very own cells! (and we have 37-70 trillion cells, depending on the source) Studies have shown that 8-40% of our genome is derived from viral DNA that has been incorporated into our own at some point along the way, and viruses continue to play an important role in our interaction and adaptations with the world around us; consistently helping our body's update information about our environment.

Much more to get into, as I have other blogs written on this very subject... but needed to get that out of the way.

Oh.. and one more point..

WE WILL NEVER ESCAPE BACTERIA AND VIRUSES. (and particularly viruses ;)

It's been proven, time and time again... but the standard dogma wants to keep us chained to the "germ theory", disempowering you and the innate superpower called your immune system, and want us to remain in a perpetual state of FEAR ---Thus establishing control and leaving the general population buying into their theories and patentable/marketable solutions.

Instead of thinking you're being 'attacked' by germs... why not just accept that they're a natural part of the world (or... should be... until we tinker with them ;), and that by establishing a balanced state of health, your body will innately be resilient and adaptable with any stresses that come along. Which includes any strain of virus or bacteria.

Key Points to Consider:

Is it... really necessary?

To determine this crucial factor -- we need REAL data. Which, has been hard to come by...

Even after 2+ years, any of our governing entities have yet to do a comprehensive, unbiased look at how masks, or lockdowns, or gene therapy 'vaccines' are impacting this 'pandemic'. (Which, isn't apparently a pandemic when many countries have all but given up on every 'protective' measure and have resumed normal life... and somehow have far lower death rates than the US, Canada and other tyrannical countries...)

Actually.. the C/D/C admits to leaving out reports and data that could 'impact public perception of things like vaccines'. Yea... they said that.

Good place to start:

Who's really being affected?

Like I mentioned above... we're NEVER going to be able to escape viruses. They're a part of our environment, and do play an integral role in our overall health. That being said, everyone is 'affected' to some degree. Most will never symptomatically feel the effects, and the vast majority of those that do, experience it as... you guessed it; a cold. As with any viral infection, only a very small majority actually have severe adverse side-effects.

I state it as 'side-effects' because it's typically not the actual viral infection that causes major issues for those susceptible... it's other underlying, more chronic issues that cause havoc.

Since the beginning of this debacle... this part of the story has always been consistent; those with pre-existing condition AND elderly. Which, happens to be no different from any other pathogenic viral strain that circulate the planet every year. Sure, other strains affect people differently, and there's always outliers. Those with cardiovascular disease, overweight, poor metabolic health, diabetes, immune system disorders, etc are, and have always been, more susceptible to any environmental stress.

This really shouldn't take a massive research study to prove, as it should make logical physiological, immunological sense... but apparently we do.

Underlying Medical Conditions and Severe Illness Among 540,667 Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19, March 2020–March 2021

-From the mouth of the beast itself: CDC


Among 4,899,447 hospitalized adults in PHD-SR, 540,667 (11.0%) were patients with COVID-19, of whom 94.9% had at least 1 underlying medical condition. Essential hypertension (50.4%), disorders of lipid metabolism (49.4%), and obesity (33.0%) were the most common. The strongest risk factors for death were obesity (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.27–1.33), anxiety and fear-related disorders (aRR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25–1.31), and diabetes with complication (aRR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.24–1.28), as well as the total number of conditions, with aRRs of death ranging from 1.53 (95% CI, 1.41–1.67) for patients with 1 condition to 3.82 (95% CI, 3.45–4.23) for patients with more than 10 conditions (compared with patients with no conditions).


Certain underlying conditions and the number of conditions were associated with severe COVID-19 illness. Hypertension and disorders of lipid metabolism were the most frequent, whereas obesity, diabetes with complication, and anxiety disorders were the strongest risk factors for severe COVID-19 illness. Careful evaluation and management of underlying conditions among patients with COVID-19 can help stratify risk for severe illness."

Is natural immunity superior to vaccine-induced?

Dr. Peter McCullough

According to Dr. McCullough, a cardiologist, internist and epidemiologist, and editor of two peer-review journals, who has been on the media and medical frontlines fighting for early COVID treatment... “natural immunity is infinitely better than vaccine immunity,” and studies have borne that out time and again. The reason natural immunity is superior to vaccine-induced immunity is because viruses contain five different proteins.

The COVID shot induces antibodies against just one of those proteins, the spike protein, and no T cell immunity. When you’re infected with the whole virus, you develop antibodies against all parts of the virus, plus memory T cells.

This also means natural immunity offers better protection against variants, as it recognizes several parts of the virus. If there are significant alternations to the spike protein, as with the Delta variant, vaccine-induced immunity can be evaded. Not so with natural immunity, as the other proteins are still recognized and attacked.

Here’s a sampling of scholarly publications that have investigated natural immunity as it pertains to SARS-CoV-2 infection. There are several more in addition to these:12

Science Immunology October 202013found that “RBD-targeted antibodies are excellent markers of previous and recent infection, that differential isotype measurements can help distinguish between recent and older infections, and that IgG responses persist over the first few months after infection and are highly correlated with neutralizing antibodies.” The BMJ January 202114 concluded that “Of 11, 000 health care workers who had proved evidence of infection during the first wave of the pandemic in the U.K. between March and April 2020, none had symptomatic reinfection in the second wave of the virus between October and November 2020.” Science February 202115 reported that “Substantial immune memory is generated after COVID-19, involving all four major types of immune memory [antibodies, memory B cells, memory CD8+ T cells, and memory CD4+ T cells].

About 95% of subjects retained immune memory at ~6 months after infection. Circulating antibody titers were not predictive of T cell memory. Thus, simple serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies do not reflect the richness and durability of immune memory to SARS-CoV-2.”

A 2,800-person study found no symptomatic reinfections over a ~118-day window, and a 1,246-person study observed no symptomatic reinfections over 6 months. A February 2021 study posted on the prepublication server medRxiv16concluded that “Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy ~95% for at least seven months.” An April 2021 study posted on medRxiv17 reported “the overall estimated level of protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for documented infection is 94.8%; hospitalization 94.1%; and severe illness 96·4%. Our results question the need to vaccinate previously-infected individuals.” Another April 2021 study posted on the preprint server BioRxiv18 concluded that “following a typical case of mild COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells not only persist but continuously differentiate in a coordinated fashion well into convalescence, into a state characteristic of long-lived, self-renewing memory.” A May 2020 report in the journal Immunity19 confirmed that SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies are detected in COVID-19 convalescent subjects, as well as cellular immune responses. Here, they found that neutralizing antibody titers do correlate with the number of virus-specific T cells. A May 2021 Nature article20 found SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells, which are a crucial source of protective antibodies. Even after mild infection, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies were detectable beyond 11 months’ post-infection. A May 2021 study in E Clinical Medicine21 found “antibody detection is possible for almost a year post-natural infection of COVID-19.” According to the authors, “Based on current evidence, we hypothesize that antibodies to both S and N-proteins after natural infection may persist for longer than previously thought, thereby providing evidence of sustainability that may influence post-pandemic planning.” Cure-Hub data22 confirm that while COVID shots can generate higher antibody levels than natural infection, this does not mean vaccine-induced immunity is more protective. Importantly, natural immunity confers much wider protection as your body recognizes all five proteins of the virus and not just one. With the COVID shot, your body only recognizes one of these proteins, the spike protein. A June 2021 Nature article23 points out that “Wang et al. show that, between six and 12 months after infection, the concentration of neutralizing antibodies remains unchanged. That the acute immune reaction extends even beyond six months is suggested by the authors’ analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells in the blood of the convalescent individuals over the course of the year.

These memory B cells continuously enhance the reactivity of their SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies through a process known as somatic hypermutation. The good news is that the evidence thus far predicts that infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces long-term immunity in most individuals.”

-Via Craig Burns

Had COVID? You’ll probably make antibodies for a lifetime

People who recover from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades, although viral variants could dampen some of the protection they offer.

Prevalence and Durability of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Among Unvaccinated US Adults by History of COVID-19 want to smoke ciggarets, drink soda, not exercise, and be a stressed out, negative person all day ---- that's YOUR choice to make!

2021-10-25 ::: Nature of the COVID-era public health disaster in the USA, from all-cause mortality and socio-geo-economic and climatic data

Iceland says it wants ‘as many people as possible’ to catch Covid after lifting all restrictions


Is it... actually effective?

"The short-term effectiveness of a two-dose regimen of the BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was demonstrated in clinical trials2 and in observational settings3,4. However, long term effectiveness across different variants is still unknown, though reports of waning immunity are beginning to surface, not merely in terms of antibody dynamics over time57, but in real-world settings as well8. Alongside the question of long-term protection provided by the vaccine, the degree and duration to which previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 affords protection against repeated infection also remains unclear."

Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States

Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 30 : 1–4.

PMCID: PMC8481107

--> We investigate the relationship between the percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases across 68 countries and across 2947 counties in the US.

Across the world::

At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.

In the U.S::

"Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%."

More inconvenient findings:

in a report released from the Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against preventing COVID-19 infection was reported to be 39% [6], substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96% [7]. It is also emerging that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus [8]. A substantial decline in immunity from mRNA vaccines 6-months post immunization has also been reported [9]. Even though vaccinations offers protection to individuals against severe hospitalization and death, the CDC reported an increase from 0.01 to 9% and 0 to 15.1% (between January to May 2021) in the rates of hospitalizations and deaths, respectively, amongst the fully vaccinated [10].

Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States

Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 30 : 1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7 [Epub ahead of print]

PMCID: PMC8481107 PMID: 34591202

Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021

Also straight from the CDC

"During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%. Approximately three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine ≥14 days before exposure)"

How The Definition of "Fully Vaccinated" Misleads People on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety & Efficacy: An Explanation For CNN's Drew Griffin

Jabs do not reduce risk of passing Covid within household, study suggests

Could it make things... worse?

-->Wouldn't be the first vaccine to do so. Which, makes perfect sense when considering the way in which vaccines and our immune system work.

Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens

"Could some vaccines drive the evolution of more virulent pathogens? Conventional wisdom is that natural selection will remove highly lethal pathogens if host death greatly reduces transmission. Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population. Here we show experimentally that immunization of chickens against Marek's disease virus enhances the fitness of more virulent strains, making it possible for hyperpathogenic strains to transmit. Immunity elicited by direct vaccination or by maternal vaccination prolongs host survival but does not prevent infection, viral replication or transmission, thus extending the infectious periods of strains otherwise too lethal to persist. Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts."

Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection than the Unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day; there is no justification for Vaccine Passports

RE: Mandatory mRNA vaccine mandate for Alberta physicians

College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) Council 2700 – 10020 100 Street NW Edmonton, AB Canada T5J 0N3

EU Warns Repeat Boosters Could Weaken Immune System

-This is not a new phenomenon... the effects of waning effectiveness have been seen with repeat flu shots.

-The need for multiple boosters in a year, is just absurd. It should at least make you question how effective it is in the first place.


Are there ... other options?

I think you already know the answer...

Let's start from the very basics:

A healthy foundation.

Plenty of other articles written on this very subject, as... this is what I practice and preach

HCQ for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 302 studies


Is it... actually safe?


Think again, before you trust everything that comes from the FDA or gov't...

Interesting point of consideration: it was approved privately with no public discussion.

Covid-19: FDA set to grant full approval to Pfizer vaccine without public discussion of data

"Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee,4 said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data.

“These public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,” she said. “The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval.”

Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition5 calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a meeting “we have no idea what the data looks like.”

“It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,” she said. “There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed."

--> Couldn't agree more!